Change some parts of the core API to use mp_uint_t instead of uint/int.
Addressing issue #50, still some way to go yet.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ STATIC mp_obj_t array_construct(char typecode, mp_obj_t initializer) {
|
||||
return array;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t array_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, uint n_args, uint n_kw, const mp_obj_t *args) {
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t array_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, mp_uint_t n_args, mp_uint_t n_kw, const mp_obj_t *args) {
|
||||
mp_arg_check_num(n_args, n_kw, 1, 2, false);
|
||||
|
||||
// get typecode
|
||||
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ STATIC mp_obj_t array_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, uint n_args, uint n_kw, const m
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t bytearray_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, uint n_args, uint n_kw, const mp_obj_t *args) {
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t bytearray_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, mp_uint_t n_args, mp_uint_t n_kw, const mp_obj_t *args) {
|
||||
mp_arg_check_num(n_args, n_kw, 0, 1, false);
|
||||
|
||||
if (n_args == 0) {
|
||||
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ STATIC mp_obj_t bytearray_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, uint n_args, uint n_kw, con
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t array_unary_op(int op, mp_obj_t o_in) {
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t array_unary_op(mp_uint_t op, mp_obj_t o_in) {
|
||||
mp_obj_array_t *o = o_in;
|
||||
switch (op) {
|
||||
case MP_UNARY_OP_BOOL: return MP_BOOL(o->len != 0);
|
||||
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ STATIC mp_obj_t array_unary_op(int op, mp_obj_t o_in) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t array_binary_op(int op, mp_obj_t lhs_in, mp_obj_t rhs_in) {
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t array_binary_op(mp_uint_t op, mp_obj_t lhs_in, mp_obj_t rhs_in) {
|
||||
switch (op) {
|
||||
case MP_BINARY_OP_EQUAL: {
|
||||
mp_buffer_info_t lhs_bufinfo;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user