Change some parts of the core API to use mp_uint_t instead of uint/int.
Addressing issue #50, still some way to go yet.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ STATIC void bool_print(void (*print)(void *env, const char *fmt, ...), void *env
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t bool_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, uint n_args, uint n_kw, const mp_obj_t *args) {
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t bool_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, mp_uint_t n_args, mp_uint_t n_kw, const mp_obj_t *args) {
|
||||
mp_arg_check_num(n_args, n_kw, 0, 1, false);
|
||||
|
||||
switch (n_args) {
|
||||
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ STATIC mp_obj_t bool_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, uint n_args, uint n_kw, const mp
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t bool_unary_op(int op, mp_obj_t o_in) {
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t bool_unary_op(mp_uint_t op, mp_obj_t o_in) {
|
||||
mp_int_t value = ((mp_obj_bool_t*)o_in)->value;
|
||||
switch (op) {
|
||||
case MP_UNARY_OP_BOOL: return o_in;
|
||||
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ STATIC mp_obj_t bool_unary_op(int op, mp_obj_t o_in) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t bool_binary_op(int op, mp_obj_t lhs_in, mp_obj_t rhs_in) {
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t bool_binary_op(mp_uint_t op, mp_obj_t lhs_in, mp_obj_t rhs_in) {
|
||||
if (MP_BINARY_OP_OR <= op && op <= MP_BINARY_OP_NOT_EQUAL) {
|
||||
return mp_binary_op(op, MP_OBJ_NEW_SMALL_INT(mp_obj_is_true(lhs_in)), rhs_in);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user