Change some parts of the core API to use mp_uint_t instead of uint/int.
Addressing issue #50, still some way to go yet.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ typedef struct _mp_obj_map_t {
|
||||
mp_obj_t iters[];
|
||||
} mp_obj_map_t;
|
||||
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t map_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, uint n_args, uint n_kw, const mp_obj_t *args) {
|
||||
STATIC mp_obj_t map_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, mp_uint_t n_args, mp_uint_t n_kw, const mp_obj_t *args) {
|
||||
if (n_args < 2 || n_kw != 0) {
|
||||
nlr_raise(mp_obj_new_exception_msg(&mp_type_TypeError, "map must have at least 2 arguments and no keyword arguments"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ STATIC mp_obj_t map_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, uint n_args, uint n_kw, const mp_
|
||||
o->base.type = &mp_type_map;
|
||||
o->n_iters = n_args - 1;
|
||||
o->fun = args[0];
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < n_args - 1; i++) {
|
||||
for (mp_uint_t i = 0; i < n_args - 1; i++) {
|
||||
o->iters[i] = mp_getiter(args[i + 1]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return o;
|
||||
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ STATIC mp_obj_t map_iternext(mp_obj_t self_in) {
|
||||
mp_obj_map_t *self = self_in;
|
||||
mp_obj_t *nextses = m_new(mp_obj_t, self->n_iters);
|
||||
|
||||
for (int i = 0; i < self->n_iters; i++) {
|
||||
for (mp_uint_t i = 0; i < self->n_iters; i++) {
|
||||
mp_obj_t next = mp_iternext(self->iters[i]);
|
||||
if (next == MP_OBJ_STOP_ITERATION) {
|
||||
m_del(mp_obj_t, nextses, self->n_iters);
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user